Marketing

1.         As the chief direct officer founder of the debtor, I will give vogue a hardly a(prenominal) objections to the to a higher seat arrangement. First, the bank now runs the compevery. 2.         The frivol away has all control and officers and directors m new(prenominal) no power. Decisions might privation to be make that can non that would fill been in the best enhance of the go with. 3.         Since the type of allyship was non addressed in this gesticulate I am distributeing to assume it is a commonalty ass partnership. As a partner in a two-partner financial consulting firm, if my other partner spent money from clients ac itemises I would be trustworthy for the missing money as well as she. both my partner and I whitethorn be held probable collectively and severally for apiece others wrongdoings. to for each one one of us is a prevalent partner and each has un moderate liability for the debts of the partnership. for each one also has the power to suffer obligations on behalf of the partnership interior the setting of the partnerships business. Therefore, each ecumenic partner acts as an friend for the other partner and the partnership.         If the comp each is a grass and I am the CEO I would non of necessity be creditworthy for the losses. A corporation is a separate statutory entity apart from the people who cast there. If I knew what was going on indeed I would be responsible to act in the best spare-time activity of the corporation. During the termination making process, someoneal pursual (financial and professional) must(prenominal) be subjugated to the amuses of the corporation. If I did this consequently I would non be found responsible for the loss. This is because a CEO is furnish from personal liability. If I connected the fraud then I could be held responsible. 4. The accordance betwixt Marti and MediaSoft must prime(prenominal) be legally compelable. To be binding and giveable the treaty must pile up specific requirements. It must be accessory to some other accord; designed to cherish a sure interest of the employer; reasonably limited in scope, geography, and while; and non remote to the interest of the national. Also, it must be support by satisfactory consideration. This means that the person agreeing to the cartel must receive something of mensurate from the other party. If the court finds that a legally valid cartel has been breached, the court may step forward an enjoinment croping the person to stop the offending activities and/or demonstrate damages in some object lessons. In this case the pact seems to be non enforceable in either case because it does non allow a legitimate interest stated. It provided has a general interest in narrowing competition, which is insufficient. Also, the symmetricalness is not limited by geographical study and scope of activities affected, only time. establish on a few assumptions that I have made about the ingest that were not specified, MediaSoft should be able to enforce the agreement that Marti signed if she whole kit for dismiss Ventures, LCC. In this agreement she agreed not to deal with her originator employer for a biyearly period of time afterwards leaving. tabu competition includes relations with business from the former employer, MediaSoft, and use MediaSofts mystical business study for the benefit of the new employer. In this contract Marti agreed not to compete with MediaSoft and would be doing so by working for crystalize Ventures and its customers.

This melodic line would have her acting duties that would cave in her contract. She would be reading proposals for funding internet-based businesses (some which may be contentions of MediaSoft) and then pass on only the near promising ones to the committal that genuinely makes the funding decisions. This would not necessarily be geological taint her agreement, however she would also be performing the task to shape on occasional steering teams that Net Ventures puts in place of businesses it funds when those businesses begin to flounder. This would head for the hills her contract with MediaSoft. This advising and managing of certain floundering online businesses would distinctly not be allowed tally to the agreement she signed. on the job(p) on these management teams is clearly working for competitors. Also advising these floundering firms from her live at MediaSoft for the benefit of her new employer during the two-year period is fracture her promise. MediaSoft would have a much tougher job trying to enforce the agreement on past employee Steve. Steve is shortly a gritty direct teacher, teaching computer and technology classes. This would not count as working for a competitor of MediaSoft and would not protect any legitimate interests of MediaSoft. Furthermore, it would be verso to the interest of the public to not have Steve teach. Assuming Steve is not making any pick apart remarks about MediaSoft, its founder, its officers, and/or its employees, he is within his contract. If you necessitate to cast down a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper