Euphoria Case Study Essay

Human spiritedness as we know has been turn out crack with a scientific discovery created through the efforts of Pseudoscience Research Inc. (PRI), a conglomerate pharmaceutical corporation responsible for opposite life story-time-changing advances in neo biological science and technology today. This new discovery is guaranteed to improve the step of life for most populate and would eventually establish a harmonized society human beings aspire for since time immemorial. In a teeming ceremony held at the offices of PRI, the miracle medicate was unveiled to wide public acclaim. It was set forth as unitary of the most innovative and promising invention of the twenty-second century. The music euphory is generally regarded as the most effective and popular drug since viagra hit the stores. euphory comes from the Greek word euphoros kernel healthy. As what its name espo habituates, euphory aims to improve the survives of the bulk of people who live life in constant depr ession, poverty, and hunger by inducing pictorial felicity and weightlessness. Indeed, euphory changes everything. As a response to the growing engage in society, PRI started to conduct research on a drug that may well be the biological ubermensch of the masses in instal to rid of constant financial, social, and soulal problems that the individual has to experience on a daily basis. On July 14, 1971, PRI jumpstarted the research on a new euphony that will biologically eliminate problems and hardships of an individual by developing a pill concentrated with endorphins and other happiness-inducing chemicals that will harmlessly alter the catching code of the person as well as increase the shape endorphin matter of the normal human body.Thus, Euphoria was born. Since the drugs invention, it has been time-tested on human subjects to adhere to the pre-existing laws on animal offbeat in lieu with testing. During the early 90s, PRI was threatened with bankruptcy as the company was openly criticized for making an amoral and immoral drug simultaneously. Mostly pro-life groups rejected the idea of the drug, as it did non value human life while intellectuals criticized it as something that is atrocious since it pick ups out choice of a person to be miserable. But it was a famous Hollywood actress who supported the drug and brought PRI into the A-list of corporations in the world today.The three-time Oscar winner actress argued publicly that the drug has helped her made her line of achievement and improved her way of life ever since. Consequently, PRI cut-rate sales on Euphoria went up by 50% in just a family and presently the company made a name for itself as one of the leading brands in healthc are in 2004. Today, Euphoria has replaced painkillers, anti-depressants, and other unimportant antibiotics since it completely prevents the user from getting sick. It has been proven effective with absolutely no side effects such as drowsiness, dizziness, stomac h pains, chest pains, headaches, fever, and death.Since its invention, the drug has been widely-used by the public and from substantial surveys conducted by PRI itself, it has been revealed that almost 95.457% of the population take the drug as an answer to the problems since there are no other drugs that will enable them to be happy and succeederful. In addition, that percentage also proves the drugs popularity and effectiveness, as it won numerous awards including the Discovery of the division recognition from Time Magazine. In 2008, the drug established the name of PRI, becoming the worlds foremost conglomerate in medicinal development. meek Beginnings The credit with the creation of the phenomenal drug goes to Dr. William falsetto, a Harvard medicine graduate, who got the sharp inspiration of creating Euphoria during a friendly banter over a couple of beers when his colleague suggested him to create a drug that has a native high without the side effects rival to that of v iagra and morphine. Because of his desktop as a distinguished alumnus of one of the top universities in the world, his credibility follows with his invention and therefore the drugs eventual success. 1 He establish his assumptions from an empirical laboratory experiment wherein he carefully tested the subdue of endorphins that the human body produces at a normal rate. After determine such, he further experimented on the subject with three meaty theories. get-go is to determine the amount of endorphins that a normal body produces when exercising. In a head published in the PRI research journal from 1991, Falsetto think that the body gives off 86% more endorphins that stimulate happiness and elation.2However, he debunked his theory stating that exercising is not an activity done by majority of the masses and would therefore cause a low selling and merchandising rate. The second theory was to determine the amount of endorphins when eating large amounts of chocolate. The result w as also promising exactly Falsetto soon discovered that chocolate- generate happiness is followed by undesirable side-effects such as diabetes and fluctuating sugar levels of the body. The conclusion theory proved to be the most effective as Falsetto discovered that endorphins could be extracted as a solid powder form and could be placed in regular tablets sold.The formula is of course under(a) strict protection of the PRI, NSA, CIA, FBI, EUROPOL and the United Nations, but Falsetto disclosed in a press interview when the drug reached its 10th year of success that it contains naturally-produced endorphins that add to the natural threshold of the human body and it increases happiness that in turn causes motivation, energy, and a positivist attitude. He boldly added that the drug slew replace viagra since it also increases the sexual drive of the human body. Because of his background as a Harvard graduate, the credibility of the drug was never compromised when it went on sale sinc e 1995.3 In relation with the drugs almost monumental failure, the Hollywood actress who still refuses to reveal her identity said that it almost saved her life and career. Since then, PRI inaugurated the celebrated actress as one of the chairpersons of the company and eventually her ascension as the CEO of the company. Her statement reached almost the entirety of Hollywoods royal family and soon, millions of people were convinced of Euphoria. Heads of State and royal families soon followed suit, stating the drugs effectivity and rationality over decision-making, political relationships, and terrorist negotiations. The drug also replaced the calumnious and illegal drugs such as cocaine and marijuana since Euphoria induced a natural high without the hallucinogens found in the illegal drugs. In 2001, 92% of the world population agreed on the use of Euphoria and consequently stamped out the drugs immoral and unethical issues regarding its use and nature. The test subjects widely acce pted the drug4 since the drug contains natural endorphins, and it follows that it marginally increases elation and happiness feeling for the person. Since happiness and elation are important for ain motivation, the drug then helps in changing the mood of the person as well as affecting change with regards to eating habits and behavior.Also, work intersection has also been increased since employees are now very happy with their work. Euphoria also replaces viagra as a safe alternative since the drug is naturally produced. With health issues, endorphins also increase the white blood count of the body and therefore prevent the body from acquiring diseases.5 Majority of the people agree on the drug since it is right for the body and life as well as the right thing to do. Its moral issues were disproved since there are no deaths or accidents that are linked to the drug.6 In 1992, there was a worldwide appeal to governments that the standard of living for most of the countries is declin ing because of unemployment and poverty. However, as soon as Euphoria was introduced to the world, galore(postnominal) agree that the drug has saved many lives. It is noteworthy to mention that in one of the political debates in the UN collision of 2007, the assembly concluded that the quality of life is steadily declining and if the case is not addressed, more human lives are at stake. Either the drug should be globally legalized or the world would continue to degrade in price of living standards and health issues. Naturally, the drug was finally given worldwide flattery during September of that year, and since then, it has been proven effective.7However, several pharmaceutical companies rejected the claim of Euphoria to be a universal solution for biological problems. The case went to court, but it was easily dismissed by the ruling that there were no substantive claims to prove that the drug was indeed ineffective. Consequently, it also proved to be the go point for major an d minor drug companies as PRI bought the companies and formed into a multi-national biological research company.8 Furthermore, since there are contentions with regards the effects of the medicine, it has concluded that the medicines claims are true. Mr. Falsetto received the Nobel Peace prize for euphony and named one of the 22nd centurys greatest thinkers.9 Because of Euphorias discovery and monumental success, it has been regarded as the drug that saved the world from affliction and caused much development in the quality of living for the whole world. at that place are no more wars, political maneuvering, strife, poverty, and colds. The global quality of life has improved, notable through the many recent milestones in human report such as excessive singing, the development of the cure against AIDS and HIV, and a harmonious societal structure where there is no class clamber and alienation since everybody is equally happy. Thanks to Dr. Willam Falsetoo, the world is now a bette r place.101 Ad Hominem (Argument to the Man)2 Error of Fact3 Weak Analogy4 Ad Populum (Appeal to the Masses)5 precipitate Generalization6 Equivocation7 False Dichotomy8 Appeal to Ignorance9 Burden of verification10 Post Hoc (False Cause)