The Ineptitude Of The United S :: essays research papers

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all custody be created equal, that they argon endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Those are the opening lines to the settlement of emancipation. The Declaration of Independence was written in 1776. Yet, slavery continued in the United States for about ninety years after this document declared that "all men where created equal," and those "unalienable ripes" are still not shared by every wiz in the United States. The U.S. has been lacking in its accountability to its citizens. The country responsibility for tender and civil rights must be expanded in the United States.In December 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The thirty articles of the UDHR were developed to provide a clear explanation of human rights. It then became the responsibility of the nati ons of the United Nations to protect those rights. This is where the United States is lacking. The U.S. is one of the founding nations of the United Nations and one of the most influential, yet it has failed to take adapted state responsibility for human rights.Before the ineptitude of the United States can be discussed, the c at one timept of state responsibility for human and civil rights must be clearly defined. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines state as "a politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory," and responsibility as " virtuous, legal, or mental accountability." These definitions of state and responsibility can be interpreted and combined to provide a literal definition of state responsibility. The definition of state responsibility could then be seen as "the honourable and legal accountability of a government." A concise notion of state responsibility for human and civil rights would then be congruent to &quo tthe moral and legal accountability of government for life, liberty, security, and any other finite right of a person." With the concept of state responsibility for human and civil rights having been defined, the result of state responsibility in the United States can be discussed. Rhonda Copelon once noted, "the most limited conception of state responsibility in the United States has been basically dismantled." Copelon also made a statement to the effect that rights in the U.S. are limited to constraints on government and that they do not reach offstage conduct or include the most basic social and stinting needs.